Travel Writing: Romantics to Newspaper :: Analysis Literature Traveling Essays Papers

Travel Writing Romantics to Newspaper After adaptation various works from Romantic travel sources such as Gilpin, Wordsworth, Goethe and others, I was interested in how their writings conventions have changed when a different metier is used. every(prenominal) Saturday the local newspaper, The Edmonton Journal, has a section that is strictly dedicated to travel destinations and topics pertaining to travel. fittingly named Travel, this section describes exotic locations for tourist and travelers. Its articles contrast the Romantics rendering of the environment by having less emphasis on the picturesque and sublime, more focalization on historical background, and greater detail in the lives of people living there. I believe that these differences are credited largely to one factor the writings medium influences what is being stressed as the purpose of the generator is different. Travel articles focus largely on describing nature only in terms of staple fiber description. When r eferencing a scene with specific characteristics (such as cliffs, waterfalls or mountains) the Romantic writer describes the scene as if the reader has very little experience or expectation for what the scene should look like. The result is often elaborate description after elaborate description. Newspaper travel sections do not matter to themselves with such sensory description near the same extent for a number of reasons. The newspaper focuses less on creating imagery for the reader because of the add-on in availability to travel, images of the picturesque and sublime on television and movies, and the front line of photographs physically next to the text. 1. Nearly every article, within this section, is accompanied by a large photograph showing the write downscape. By presenting the writers description of the land next to the photograph, the article intrinsically promotes a comparison by the reader, contrast the colourful photograph with the writers address. If the photograph presents a landscape different from the smart description of the travel writer (which inevitably happens with readers mental constructs) the reader leave behind find it hard to trust the writer in the accuracy of description. The writer wisely follows the saying that a picture says a thousand words and is better off letting the picture do the talking. After all, the diarist has less space and more constrictions than the novelist does. 2. The dominant concern for the travel diary keeper is conveying what they want in a limited space. The journalist does not have space to elaborately describe every cliff, river or valley. It is, therefore, up to the writer to assume that, with the addition of the given photographs, the reader would be able to visualize a serene waterfall or placid lake.