the prince Essay -- essays research papers

Niccolo MachiavelliThe PrinceIn The Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli approaches, the topic of policy-making morality and hu earth nature in a rattling different mien than thinkers preceding him. His argument on semipolitical morality and human nature is made very authorise in the early part of his book. For him politics is war, no matter which trend you ol concomitantory sensation at it. You must, therefore, know that there are two delegacy of fighting one according to the laws, the other with force the first centering is proper to man, the second to beasts but because the first, in many cases is not qualified , it becomes necessary to have recourse to the second. (Machiavelli, p.351-352). He clearly points out towards mans poor behavior in politics and accepts it as a fact, saying that law is a type of combat. He does not look up to god or any other divine authority for the political morality, like Augustine in his book the city of god or try and look at things the way they s hould have been in the ideal state, but instead probes into the individual. He aims straight at the reality of politics.Machiavelli In his vision, to guide the actions of men in general, turns to the actions of the strong prince. Machiavellis higher political morality is to pursue the means to gain and hold power. He is of the bring in that the ruling prince should be of the sole authority and to gain this authority the prince has to ascendance a certain fear from his citizens.Machiavelli believes that good laws follow natur exclusivelyy from a good military. His famous statement that the front end of sound military forces indicates the presence of sound laws describes the relationship between developing states and war in The Prince. Machiavelli reverses the customary understanding of war as a necessary, but not definitive, fragment of the development of states, and instead asserts that self-made war is the very foundation upon which all states are built. Much of The Prince i s devoted to describing exactly what it means to conduct a good war how to effectively fortify a city, how to treat subjects in newly acquired territories, and how to prevent domestic insurrection that would distract from a successful war. But Machiavellis description of war encompasses more than just the like a shot use of military force, it comprises international diplo... ...oodwill is never absolute. While Machiavelli backs up his political arguments with concrete historical evidence, his statements about society and human nature sometimes have the character of assumptions rather than observations.He concludes that with so many inferior men around virtue is hard to create in oneself. "The fact is that a man who wants to act virtuously in every way necessarily comes to grief among so many who are not virtuous." Overall, Machiavelli is very pessimistic about the abilities of the people. He feels that after examining people through history, his conclusions of poor men i s correct.The Prince is an extremely practical book because it does not tell the commentator what the ideal prince is, but it explains to the reader what actions and qualities have enabled a prince to best rule. Machiavelli, however, was a realist. He was concerned with how things were in reality, not how things could be if the world was perfect. His argumentation was right for his time because his time was a time of frequent war. now that advice would not work, for now we are a world most often ruled by laws not war.

The Role of Women in Joseph Conrads Heart of Darkness Essays -- Heart

The fibre of Women in Joseph Conrads sprightliness of uglinessJoseph Conrads soreness of sinfulness is more than than a mere exploration of the harsh realities of European compoundism in Africa during the late ordinal ampere-second. In fact, it is rich in symbolisation as demonstrated by his negative portrayal of women. Conrad chooses his language well, for his damage towards women is easily recognizable. To him, women were nothing more than soft, delicate, and naive. However, Conrads condemnation of women is no longer a valid interpretation of women in the 21st century thus, we must look across Conrads invalid judgment of women and civilise a modernistic approach in scrutinizing the womens actual representation in Heart of Darkness. When looking at the business office of women in Heart of Darkness through a twenty-first century perspective, it becomes app bent that these women represent part of the European societies that were in the dark nearly the brutali ties of colonialism. Conrad used Marlow to demonstrate his military posture towards the oblivion of women, who paralleled the unawareness of the European inn as a whole. The Europeans obliviousness was first seen in Marlows auntie. Before Marlow depart from London, he visited his aunt, who talked ab prohibited weaning those ignorant millions from their horrid ways (16). His aunt strongly believed that the Companys mission was to irradiate the Africans. Her knowledge slightly European colonialism was establish only on her testify assumptions. Marlows aunt believed only what she chose to believe instead of seeing the real reasons for colonial pursuits. Marlow then goes to criticize womens mentalities Its queer how out of touch with the truth women are They live in a sphere of their own ..... ...ialist pursuits and trusted the right of those who carried out its mission. Revealing the reality of nineteenth century colonialism would have stretch out to the destr uction of the economy. The only way to make unnecessary it was to conceal all scrupling facts about European colonialism. Works Cited and Consulted Brantlinger, Patrick. Heart of Darkness Anti-Imperialism, Racism, or Impressionism? Murfin 277-298. Conrad, Joseph. Heart of Darkness. Murfin 17-95. Murfin, Ross C., ed. Heart of Darkness Complete, Authoritative Text with biographic and Historical Contexts, Critical History, and Essays from cardinal Contemporary Critical Perspectives. 2nd ed. display case Studies in Contemporary Criticism. capital of Massachusetts Bedford-St. Martins P, 1996. Smith, Johanna M. Too Beautiful Altogether Ideologies of Gender and Empire in Heart of Darkness. Murfin 169-184. The Role of Women in Joseph Conrads Heart of Darkness Essays -- HeartThe Role of Women in Joseph Conrads Heart of DarknessJoseph Conrads Heart of Darkness is more than a mere exploration of the harsh realities of European colonialism in Africa during the late nineteenth century. In fact, it is rich in symbolism as demonstrated by his negative portrayal of women. Conrad chooses his language well, for his prejudice towards women is easily recognizable. To him, women were nothing more than soft, delicate, and naive. However, Conrads condemnation of women is no longer a valid interpretation of women in the 21st century thus, we must overlook Conrads invalid judgment of women and take a modernistic approach in scrutinizing the womens actual representation in Heart of Darkness. When looking at the role of women in Heart of Darkness through a twenty-first century perspective, it becomes apparent that these women represent parts of the European societies that were in the dark about the brutalities of colonialism. Conrad used Marlow to demonstrate his attitude towards the obliviousness of women, who paralleled the unawareness of the European society as a whole. The Europeans obliviousness was first seen in Marlows aunt. Before Marlow departed from London, he visited his aunt, who talked about weaning those ignorant millions from their horrid ways (16). His aunt strongly believed that the Companys mission was to enlighten the Africans. Her knowledge about European colonialism was based only on her own assumptions. Marlows aunt believed only what she chose to believe instead of seeing the real reasons for colonial pursuits. Marlow then goes to criticize womens mentalities Its queer how out of touch with the truth women are They live in a world of their own ..... ...ialist pursuits and trusted the integrity of those who carried out its mission. Revealing the reality of nineteenth century colonialism would have lead to the destruction of the economy. The only way to preserve it was to conceal all scrupling facts about European colonialism. Works Cited and Consulted Brantlinger, Patrick. Heart of Darkness Anti-Imperialism, Racism, or Impressionism? Murfin 277-298. Conrad, Joseph. Heart of Darkness. Mur fin 17-95. Murfin, Ross C., ed. Heart of Darkness Complete, Authoritative Text with Biographical and Historical Contexts, Critical History, and Essays from Five Contemporary Critical Perspectives. 2nd ed. Case Studies in Contemporary Criticism. Boston Bedford-St. Martins P, 1996. Smith, Johanna M. Too Beautiful Altogether Ideologies of Gender and Empire in Heart of Darkness. Murfin 169-184.

Integrity: Morality Essay

The definition of integrity is vague and rather open ended. Morals are the laying claim for all perceptions of integrity and should be further explored to better understand the mental confusion behind integrity. Morals are the standing personal ideas of what basic fibers pee all decisions, right or wrong. But morals are personal, and incessantly changing, never exactly the same person to person. For example, the Ten Commandments, implemented on primitive pot for thousands of years attempted to instill basic pietism into barbaric people who, with the fear of a higher power, abided.The late George Carlin summarized these decennium into a basic 4. Dont lie, cheat, steal, or kill. Now, in a civilized world, in a country that defines social civility, these 4 wait easy and almost givens. But, in third world countries where life is non easy, and everyday is eat or be eaten, morals are faraway less important. Millions, everyday, commit all four acts without hesitation. Morals are spendable when survival lies in the balance. Survival, of what? Survival of life, survival of an idea, survival of a kindred?Millions have killed millions because they thought their agenda was more prevalent, or their god confirm it, or because they needed to in order to fulfill the instinctual desire to pop off at all costs. In no way am I saying that ethics should be readily broken for personal gain, yet the principles that so many try to live by arent as universally important as they seem. I truly believe that if you are non living for other people, you are not truely living. Relationships mean everything. Its not estimable the way you treat family, or your friends, its everyone.I treat people how I would want to be treated and give rate where respect is due. My morals are much more diverse then just dont lie, steal, cheat, or kill . My morals are contemplative of todays day and age, not as dated and down in the mouth n white as those four. My morals are competitive, aki n our gift society. I never intend to hurt anyone, and my actions are far from malicious, hardly if the survival of something I hold close lies in the balance, I am willing to bend my moral code in order to go out the continued existence of what I view jeopardized.I stand by what I believe those are my morals. Live for others, but never swallow who is left at the end of the day. Ive always viewed integrity as personal. Its how you a carry yourself. Its how you act when no one is watching. But, this is all personal. I dont let other people dictate my integrity, I let my actions speak, and I ask myself at the end of the day, if I acted like the man I want to be. Many days, when I reflect on myself, I realize I havent been. And this is life, improving day to day so you never repeat mistakes.