Terrorism Essay -- essays research papers

Terrorism is the unlawful use of major power against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civil population or any segment thereof, in the furtherance of political or social objectives". This definition includes triad elements (1) Terrorist activities atomic number 18 illegal and charter the use of force. (2) The actions are intended to intimidate or coerce. (3) The actions are act in support of political or social objectives.The main upshot here is Terrorism and Foreign Policy. The two terms that are release to be discussed is how the war against terrorism is expanding and how American President George W. Bush misnamed his theme Security Strategy.In his State of the Union address, President Bush threaten to expand the war on terrorism to countries that are developing weapons of wad last and nations that are timid in the face of terror. The president singled show up three nations, North Korea, Iran, and Iraq as the axis of evil and that he eff iciency take military action to pre-empt the threat from their weapons of mass destruction. Although such palaver may simply be sabre rattling to intimidate those nations, the hypothesis of an expansion of the war is a real and dangerous possibility. But those three countries hardly constitute an organized alliance against the get together States, as did the more than more dangerous collaboration among Japan, Ger some, and Italy during World War II. In fact, Iran and Iraq abominate each other. And despite North Koreas continued harbouring of a hardly a(prenominal) members of the Japanese Red Army, North Korea has not actively sponsored terrorist attacks in many years. Although North Korea, Iran, and Iraq are developing (or guard acquired) weapons of mass destruction, so are many other nations. According to the Pentagon, 12 countries have nuclear weapons programs, 13 nations have biological weapons, 16 countries have chemical weapons and 28 nations have ballistic missiles. Is the president prepared to attack all of those nations? What if North Korea, Iran, or Iraq has already sent intelligence operatives or terrorists to the coupled States with weapons of mass destruction to lie in wait in case a relate is needed in retaliation for a U.S. attempt at regime change? Iran or Iraq might do the same to Israel. The fact is that the United States must live with an increasing number of nations that have acquired weapons of mass des... ...tegy promulgate by President Bush in September 2002 does just the opposite. It prescribes a global security strategy based on the false printing that the best and only way to achieve U.S. security is by forcibly creating a better and safer world in Americas image. A better admittance would be a less interventionist foreign policy.It is too late to plosive al Qaeda from targeting America and Americans. The United States must do everything in its power to dismantle the al Qaeda terrorist network worldwide, but the United St ates must also avoid needlessly making new terrorist enemies or fuelling the flames of virulent anti-American hatred. In the 21st century, the less the United States meddles in the affairs of other countries, the less likely the prospect that America and Americans pull up stakes be targets for terrorism.In sum, an apparent widening of the current war knowing to enhance U.S security could have the opposite effect.http//www.workersparty.org/expanding-war-against-terrorism.htmlhttp//www.asiasource.org/asip/bello.cfmhttp//www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/01/29/bush.speech.txt/index.htmlhttp//www.afa.org/magazine/oct1999/1099edit.asphttp//www.dsausa.org/ countersign/director.html