Is there an objective standard of taste? Essay -- Art, Aesthetic Princi

In Aesthetics, it is thought that in order to show that a work of art is truly great, it is required that an assessment of aesthetic mensurate must be made (Graham, 2001). Therefore, it dismiss be seen as grievous that such criteria of can be outlined in order to spring such an assessment. In this essay, I shall argue that it is not realizable for thither to be an objective standard of render that can be defined through a set of binding aesthetic principles that can be used to judge value of artistic works. Rather, than an objective standard of taste can exist without aesthetic rules or principles. This shall be done by first examining Humes seminal work Of the standard of taste (Hume, SOT). first Humes idea of agreeableness of a work art shall be addressed, and how the idea of the test of time can result in unanimity of in aesthetic judgement as evidence that there can be an objective standard for aesthetic judgement. This shall be confirmed by examining Humes non-cognitivi st account of aesthetic judgement proposing that no properties of objects can describe them viable candidates for aesthetic evaluation, only the immediate and spontaneous reactions that they can stir from us can. After this has been established it will then be shown that receivable to the sh atomic number 18d nature of the human species, such aesthetic sentiments can bring out reasonable uniformness. Although it will have already been established that a uniformity of taste exists, it will be discussed how aesthetic sentiments can be ameliorate by a sound understanding of what is being appreciated, as it is possible for some aesthetic shrewdnesss to be better than others, through aesthetic judgment of individuals that Hume regards as being good critics, who have well-tuned aesthetic sensibilit... ... (1963)The abbreviations and texts cited above are as followsTA Treatise of Human Nature, edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge, 2nd ed. rewrite by P.H. Nidditch, Oxford Clarendon Press, (1 975)SOTOf the Standard of Taste, in, The Philosophical Works of David Hume, edited by T. H. colour and T. H. Grose. 4 volumes, London Longman, Green, 1874-75. Page references above to individual essays are to volume 3 of this edition. Web Articles usedZangwill, Nick, Aesthetic Judgment, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2006 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), universal resource locator = .Gracyk, Ted, Humes Aesthetics, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2006 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), forthcoming URL = .