On Conflict Settlement Essay

Schick (1995) defines a combat as a classifi able structure of desires and a belief (p. 58). A conflict arises when an broker wants x and y wherein x and y ar the only options available to the agent. prone this situation, an agent whitethorn choose to react in two ways. First, the agent whitethorn choose to avoid the conflict or second, the agent whitethorn choose to resolve the conflict. In the shutdown of a conflict, the agent starts to imagine ration onlyy by seizing to think that the options available to him involves choosing both x and y or losing both x and y.In this mother wit, the agent enables the resolution of the conflict through an internal mediation of his or her desires. The same affair applies when it comes to social conflict. The difference between the two merely lies in the creative activity of a particular situation wherein the desires and beliefs of two or more agents hunt to counter that of the other(a). This shows the manner in which conflicts enable t he equilibrize of power inside an agent or within a group (Rummel, 1991, p. 76).The balancing of powers resulting from the situation of a conflict enables the balancing of the following elements interests, capabilities, and wills. Rummel (1991) pipelines conflict is a balancing of individual interests, capabilities, and wills. It is a simultaneous solution to the equations of power (p. 77). Within an social conflict, it does not necessarily mean that the agent(s) whose beliefs and desires take precedence over the other is the agent(s) who hold power within a group.The balance of powers refers to the mutual atonement of the different and contending interests within a group. In other words, the balance of powers may be understood as the result of the mediation within an interpersonal conflict. In the previous presentation, one of the groups presented steps that may be followed in case a conflict arises. The steps that they provided involve the agent(s) development of self- cogniz ance.The importance of self-awareness here can be seen if one considers that it is only through the agent(s) acknowledgment of the clashing beliefs and desires that the agent(s) will be able to deliver the goods the resolution of the conflict. This was shown by the group through a skit that they presented in class. One force note that in the skit itself, the group was able to present that failure to develop awareness may lead to aggression which might shape up enhance the conflict at hand.The importance of this skit does not lie in its means of providing an vitrine for those who were present it also enabled the audiences direct experience of a conflict. Deutsch et al (2006) notes, observing models deal effectively with difficult situations allows the observer to achieve greater freedom in coping with current and future problems of all sorts (p. 309). Despite of this, the group however, was unable to show that resolution and aggression are not the only means in which a conflict may end.Matthews and Roberts (2004) notes that conflicts may also lead to collaboration and appeals to authority (p. 451). Although one might state that this also leads to the resolution of a conflict in the sense that it ends a conflict, it is important to note that conflicts that end in this manner further breeds the creation of further disagreements amongst the agent(s) involved. Matthews and Roberts (2004) further notes that in the resolution of a conflict, at that place are certain skills which individuals should learn.These involve active listening, assertiveness, expression of feelings in seize ways, empathy and perspective taking, cooperation, negotiation, and methods for countering bias (p. 451). Although the group was unable to present all of these point, they were able to relay well the information that they had prepared for the presentation. In summary, given the cartridge clip constraints on the group, I think the group was able to relay reformatory information tha t will aid the members of the audience in the process of judgement and handling situations that may lead to both personal and interpersonal conflict.References Deutsch, M. et al. (2006). The handbook of Conflict Resolution Theory and Practice. San Francisco Jossey-Bass Publishers. Matthews, G. & R. Roberts. (2004). Emotional Intelligence Science and Myth. momma MIT Press. Rummel, R. (1991). The Conflict Helix. London Transaction Publishers. Schick, F. (1997). Making Choices A Recasting of closing Theory. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.