Corruption in The Great Gatsby

It is a conventionally held belief that opulence has degrading effects on ones character. However, In the asses, many Ameri sights in the East thought quite the contrary. F. Scott Fitzgerald ren throwed novel, The nifty Gatsby, takes the reader back into such an era through the eyes of Nick Caraway, the protagonist and narrator who vicariously experiences affluences vitiating nature through his wealthy associates. finished his portrayal of such wealthy characters as Gatsby, the Buchannan, and Jordan, F. Scott Fitzgerald depicts the turpitude and bourgeois demeanor resultant of great riches.In The Great Gatsby, the titular character himself encapsulates the notion that wealth deteriorates character. Jay Gatsby corruption generally stems from his blind idealism based on the fallacy that affluence and love are one and the same. This is evinced by the point that Gatsby falls in love with Daisy due to his teenage experiences of sumptuous lifestyle. He felt he could ingratiate himsel f to Daisy by making a fortune of his own, and therefore, transitively, Gatsby falls in love with money, not Daisy.In fact, Gatsby dismantle says that Dallas voice was full of money that was the Inexhaustible charm that rose and fell In It (101 In making the precede statement, Gatsby provides the reader with a corroborative avowal of his love for wealth, notwithstanding his intent to declare his love for Daisy. Later, in Gatsby altercation with tom turkey, It Is confirmed that Gatsby Is a bootlegger w hen Tom says, I found out what your drug-stores were he and this Wolfishly bought up a lot of side-street drug-stores here and in Chicago and sold grain alcohol over the takings (112).The fact that Gatsby would partake in illicit activity is unequivocal roof that Gatsby is Indeed corrupted by his wealth. Evidence that further substantiates the claim that Gatsby Is spoiled by his wealth Is the symbol of the green light at the end of Daisys dock. In the novel, the color green is an ar chetype for jealousy and avarice even though Gatsby can see East Egg and the green light in plain view, he cannot physically fleet it, regardless of how much he desires it.This parallels the plot point that he Is oblivious to the notion that he ordain never fit In with the fundamentally cavalier high society of East Egg, who privately abhor Gatsby parvenus. These types of blindness and envy are in and of themselves indications of decadence. For these reasons, Gatsby is a great example of how wealth can underrate morality and values. Although Gatsby Is ostensibly corrupted by affluence, Tom and Daisy Buchanan are much less pristine in character.Firstly, Nick Caraway mentions in the novel that the Buchannan only moved to East Egg to be In close proximity to the other Fenton individuals, saying that they had spent a year in France for no fussy reason, and then drifted here and there unmercifully wherever throng played polo and were rich together (11). This quotation mark Illustr ates the Idea that the Buchannan lives are disconsolate no matter where they reside. The aforesaid notion is further proven with the fact that both partners commit infidelities throughout The Great Gatsby durationTom with Myrtle and Daisy with Gatsby.Such perfidious behavior on both sides is an attestation to the fact that the Buchannan marriage is only held together by common socioeconomic backgrounds. By the novels conclusion, when Gatsby suffers a violent death, Tom and Daisy do not people, Tom and Daisy they smashed up things and creatures and then retreat jack into their money or their vast carelessness (148). Their lack of attendance only suggests that neither Tom nor Daisy have a scintilla of benevolence in their hearts only a preeminent sense experience of egoism.All of these instances corroborate the fact that Tom and Daisy Buchanan have been corrupted by their wealth. Lastly, Jordan Baker is incontestably spoiled by her own prosperity. Nick notes at Gatsby lavish party that Jordan is incurably dishonest. She wasnt able to endure being at a disadvantage and, given this unwillingness, She had begun dealing in butterflies (52). This dishonesty is evidenced by the fact that she had been involved in a scandal at a golf tournament, in which she allegedly changed the positioning of her golf crackpot to her benefit.However, she is able to get away which such duplicity because she is so inherently wealthya perquisite that is widely unavailable to the hoi polloi. Cordons dishonesty also reflects her apathetic attitude toward other people if she truly valued the people around her, she would certainly tell the truth more often. Cordons indifference to other people is exemplified hen she expressed her approval of Daisys affair, saying that Daisy ought to have something in her life (69).By using the word something to refer to Gatsby, she shows that she equates people with material possessions, an apparent portent of demutualization. For her dishonesty and apa thy towards others, Jordan is clearly spoiled by the advantages of wealth. The covetous, arrogant, and indifferent personalities in The Great Gatsby are all prime examples of how wealth victimizes virtue. James Gatsby, the title character, is in love with money, and he confuses this eve for financial success as an adulation for Daisy Buchanan.What is more, he is desperate to become accepted by people who condescend to him privately. Tom and Daisy Buchanan are heartless individuals whose unstable marriage is only held together by the glue of wealth. Lastly, Jordan Baker is a deceitful and apathetic woman who uses her wealth to pull off scandals. Through the portrayal of the enumerated characters, F. Scott Fitzgerald successfully captures the theme of abundant wealth and luxury as antecedents to moral deterioration and the desolation of ones dreams.